God has created diversity
in human nature, so that each person has specified characteristics: a unique
mentality, a unique feeling, a unique perspective on things, etc. Also God gave
each person a certain freedom and choice
to act or to behave. At the same time God has given him ordinances through
Religion (a set of beliefs, values and practices based on teachings guided by a
Messenger appointed by God), so that he should
not use the limited freedom to disturb others. Thus there are sacred things
one should handle cautiously.
One may express
his opinion on certain point, as long as it is not hurting others. So I am
astonished by the assumption of a number of European newspapers, that the
publication of the Danish cartoons by the “Jylands Posten”, picturing Prophet
Mohammad (peace and God’s blessings upon him) as a terrorist, is being
considered as freedom of opinion.
Freedom of opinion
is not absolute; it is limited by local and European legislation, which forbids
verbal or public insulting utterances against the religion of a group of
people.
The republishing
of the Danish cartoons by “Charlie Hebdo” or any other newspaper is not only
provocative, but goes against the fundamental human rights principles, which
are based on respect for all human beings, regardless of descent or religion.
On the other hand,
the outburst of violence among
Muslims
in many
countries, in reaction to that insult, are condemnable. It would have been more appropriate
to make big peaceful demonstrations,
in accordance with the dignity of Islam and its Great Prophet.
The Great Prophet
Mohammad gave the following example: Lady
Aishah (the Prophet’s spouse) narrated: A group of Jews one day asked
permission to visit the Prophet, and when they were admitted, they entered
saying: “As-Samu ‘alaik” (= Death be upon you). I (=’Aishah) said to them: But
death and the curse of God be upon you. Then the Prophet said to me: “O
‘Aishah, God is Kind and Lenient, and He likes that one should be kind and
lenient in all matters”. I said: Haven’t you heard what they said? He said: “I
have already answered them “Wa’alaikum!” (= and upon you!). (This event has
been recorded by Al-Bukhari in his “Collection of Hadith”).
In this respect,
the Qur’an teaches the believers not to revile others’ sacred: “And
do not revile those whom they invoke other than God, lest they should revile
God out of spite, and in ignorance; for goodly indeed have We made their own
doings appear unto every community; then to their Lord they shall return, and
He will tell them what they used to do” (6:108).
In reference to
the cartoons in the French satirical weekly “Charlie Hebdo” the Catholic Pope
Francis has said with fairness: “There are limits to freedom of expression when
religion is insulted. However, he also said, that killing in God’s name is an
absurdity”. This was said to reporters during a flight from Sri Lanka to the
Philippines (www.rt.com).
I very much
appreciated that declaration on the part of Pope Francis, because all other “Western”
authorities said that publishing cartoons insulting Islam and Muslims is a part
of the freedom of expression. However
they do not tolerate any doubt (even about the number of six million) on “The
horror of the Holocaust and the so-called “anti Semitic” behavior. According to
them these are the utmost sacred things. But they do not accept the fact that
there are sacred things for other nations. This is the unfair Freedom, the
unfair Liberalism.
To be fair, one
can tolerate anyone who does not have anything sacred, but he (the one who has
no sacred) should tolerate others with their sacred things too.
God calls to all
human beings: “O mankind! We have indeed created you all out of a male and a female,
and have made you into nations and tribes, so that you might come to know one
another. Verily, the noblest of you in the sight of God is the one who is most
deeply conscious of Him. Truly, God is all-knowing, all aware” (49:13).
No comments:
Post a Comment